Skip to main content

Featured

The First Chapter : Interview with Kavieng Cheng (English ver.)

This conversation marks the tenth interview in the series *'Defining Moments: The First Start or the Turning Moment'*. We meet Kavieng Cheng, a multidisciplinary artist from Hong Kong whose practice flows between the roles of artist, art director, curator, and fashion photographer. For Kavieng, these are not separate professions but shifting lenses through which she interrogates reality—art as a phenomenological mode of existence, a continuous practice of sensing the world and questioning the given. Her work operates as an archaeology of the micro-psychological, drawn to the pre-linguistic realm: gestures that occur before words form, tensions held in the body, and fragmented moments that escape the conscious filter. Working across print, wood sculpture, and laser-cut forms, she explores the paradox between organic warmth and violent precision—a duality that mirrors the human psyche, structured yet chaotic, resilient yet profoundly fragile. It was her high school teacher Ms. ...

Nam June Paik — “When Television Becomes a Canvas”

 “I use technology in the same way I used to use a violin or a piano—to shape a new kind of music, a visual music.”

Nam June Paik, early 1960s interview (cited in Nam June Paik Art Center Archives)


1. Introduction: The Revolutionary Who Turned Screens into Canvases

Nam June Paik (1932–2006) was a Korean-born artist whose life spanned Japan, Germany, and the United States. Often hailed as the “father of video art,” he ventured beyond traditional boundaries to fuse music, performance, and television into an unprecedented genre: media art. His vision—merging the avant-garde spirit with emerging electronic technologies—forever altered how art could be created and consumed.

Context:

  • The 1950s–60s were an era of rapidly evolving technology (from the early days of portable video cameras to satellite broadcasts) and heightening Cold War tensions.
  • Avant-garde music was pushing the limits of what constituted a composition, thanks in part to figures like John Cage. Paik, deeply influenced by this climate, began to view electronic media as a new artistic language, not merely a tool for mass entertainment.

2. Biographical Path: From Classical Music to Media Art

  1. Early Life and Musical Training

    • Born in Seoul, Paik showed prodigious talent for piano as a child. After moving to Japan, he enrolled at Nihon University, where he studied Western music history and aesthetics, delving into scores by Schönberg and Debussy.
    • He also developed an interest in modern philosophy—laying an intellectual framework for the conceptual leaps he would make later.
  2. Germany: A Meeting with the Avant-Garde

    • Paik moved to Munich and later Freiburg, immersing himself in experimental music circles. There he encountered John Cage’s concept of “chance operations,” which taught him that unexpected noise and random elements could be integral to a composition.
    • In his early notebooks, Paik wrote, “Television can be an instrument for performance, not just a receiver”—a radical notion at a time when TV was purely a mass-medium for passive viewing.
  3. Joining Fluxus and Crossing to America

    • By the early 1960s, Paik had linked up with the Fluxus movement—a loose international network of artists like George Maciunas and La Monte Young, who championed art as a playful, boundary-free experience.
    • In 1964, he relocated to New York, carrying with him the seeds of what would soon be recognized as video art.

3. Key Works and Detailed Insights

(1) Exposition of Music – Electronic Television (1963, Wuppertal, Germany)

  • Significance: One of Paik’s earliest exhibitions where he placed modified television sets at the center of the gallery. Visitors were encouraged to twist knobs, alter signals, and create live distortions on-screen.
  • Historical Note: This was a landmark statement that “TV need not be a mere passive device,” transforming the audience into active participants.

“The moment you twist that dial, you become a composer.”
— Nam June Paik, Exhibition Catalog, 1963

(2) TV Cello (1960s–70s)

  • Collaboration with Charlotte Moorman: A classically trained cellist turned performance artist, Moorman “played” a stack of TV monitors arranged in a cello shape, bowing them as if they were strings.
  • Visual Music: The monitors displayed live or prerecorded images, sometimes even reflecting Moorman’s own performance. The result was an interplay of sound and image—a “visual melody” that subverted expectations of both music and television.
  • Audience Reaction: Some found it irreverent (“TV sets are being disrespected!”) while others were entranced by how Paik reframed a mundane household item into something akin to a sculpture-cum-instrument.

(3) Robot K-456 (1964)

  • Mechanical Marvel: Created with servo motors and remote controls, this robot could walk, make noises, and occasionally collapse in a theatrical manner.
  • Public Debut: Paik once let K-456 wander the streets of New York, sparking bemusement and alarm in onlookers. Local tabloids called it “a strange sight” or “a tech gimmick,” but Paik saw it as “a prototype for how machines and humans might collaborate in the future.”

(4) Good Morning, Mr. Orwell (1984)

  • Global Satellite Performance: On January 1, 1984, Paik orchestrated a live broadcast linking studios in New York, Paris, and other cities, challenging George Orwell’s dystopian vision (1984) by demonstrating that electronic media could foster creativity and unity rather than oppression.
  • Star-Studded Lineup: It included artists like John Cage, Laurie Anderson, and Merce Cunningham, and was reportedly watched by millions worldwide.
  • Historical Significance: Occurring in the throes of the Cold War, this project championed the idea of an “electronic superhighway” where cultural exchange could transcend political barriers.

4. Praise, Criticism, and Controversy

Despite praise from avant-garde circles, Paik endured significant skepticism:

  • “Is This Art or Tech Stunt?” Many critics wondered if manipulating TV signals or sending a robot onto the street was mere provocation without depth.
  • Commercial vs. Artistic Debate: Some artists in the 1970s argued that television was too commercial a medium, overshadowed by advertisements and consumer culture, thus an unfit canvas for “serious” art.
  • Paik’s Response:

    “Television is no more commercial than paint. It’s how you use it that counts.”
    (Interview in the TV Guide, 1975)

In time, exhibitions like his major retrospective at the Whitney Museum of American Art (1982) and others proved he was not just a provocateur but a visionary building a new creative language.


5. Theoretical and Aesthetic Underpinnings

  1. Fluxus Philosophy

    • Fluxus championed simple, playful, and often interactive works, challenging elitist definitions of “high art.” Paik embraced this ethos, designing works that allowed ordinary people to become co-creators.
    • George Maciunas, founder of Fluxus, once wrote: “Paik is the most radical among us, turning the entire world into his instrument.”
  2. The Concept of the Electronic Superhighway

    • Paik believed that electronic networks—satellites, broadcast systems, and, in the future, the internet—would connect humanity in ways previously unimaginable.
    • He dubbed this vision the “Electronic Superhighway,” a term that foreshadowed today’s global digital landscape of social media, streaming platforms, and VR.
  3. Music, Performance, and Visual Art Collide

    • Owing to his background in composition, Paik often saw images as “notes” and electronic feedback as “melodies.”
    • This synesthetic approach is why critics like Dieter Daniels have referred to Paik’s work as “a kind of visual composition that rearranges the elements of television into scores of light and motion.”
    • (See: Daniels, D. Video Art Pioneers. Springer, 2001.)

6. Historical and Social Context: Art in the Cold War Era

  • Cold War Backdrop: When Paik staged performances like Good Morning, Mr. Orwell, the world was still locked in ideological tension between the capitalist West and the communist East.
  • Technological Advancements: The era saw the rapid development of satellite broadcasts, color television, and personal video cameras (like the Sony Portapak). Paik seized these tools to emphasize that creative potential grows when technology becomes accessible to artists and the public.
  • Cultural Exchange: Paik’s multi-city broadcasts and mixed-media collaborations symbolized breaking down national and cultural boundaries—a direct counterpoint to the restrictive climate of his time.

7. Conclusion: Extending Paik’s Vision into Our Future

Today, we live in a world where smartphones, social networks, AI, and VR have surpassed even Paik’s wildest conceptions of “hyper-connectivity.” Yet his core message resonates more than ever:

“The future is now, it’s just not evenly distributed. Art and technology must be shared by all.”
(Nam June Paik: Writings on His Art, 1974, p. 45)

A Question for Modern Readers

  • If television was Paik’s canvas, are smartphones, VR goggles, and AI chatbots our contemporary palettes?
  • How might we use these ubiquitous technologies as Paik once used the TV screen or a robot—to collaborate, provoke thought, and bridge distances?

Paik’s legacy is a reminder that artistry is about reimagining the objects and media around us. Where society sees mundane screens, Paik saw a stage for global performance. Where many saw technology’s potential for control, he saw an opportunity for creativity and communal celebration.

By blending music, performance, and electronic signals, Paik turned technology into an infinite set of artistic possibilities—a legacy that continues to guide and inspire everyone who seeks to push the boundaries of art, technology, and human connection.


References & Further Reading

  1. Nam June Paik Art Center Archives (Seoul, various years).
  2. Daniels, Dieter. Video Art Pioneers. Springer Wien New York, 2001.
  3. Whitney Museum of American Art, Nam June Paik Retrospective Catalog, 1982.
  4. Smithsonian American Art Museum, Nam June Paik: Global Visionary Exhibition Catalog, 2012–2013.
  5. Maciunas, George, various Fluxus Manifestos, 1960–1970.
  6. TV Guide Interview (1975), reprinted in Nam June Paik: Collected Writings, p. 64.

Comments